Agentic AI isn’t theoretical anymore.
It’s already inside enterprise systems, deciding what gets done, how, and when. While many consulting firms are encouraging clients to adopt these tools, few are asking the deeper question: what happens when AI takes initiative without oversight?
Most consulting firms are still applying frameworks built for traditional, supervised AI tools. Those tools follow prompts. They don’t generate their own goals or evaluate trade-offs on the fly.
Agentic AI does. It can misread incentives, pursue unintended outcomes, or make irreversible decisions. The security implications are operational, reputational, and legal.
That’s the core problem. Clients are being guided into adoption, but not into safety. And in a world where AI is acting on behalf of the business, sometimes without a human in the loop, the cost of that gap could be enormous.
Why Traditional AI Governance Isn’t Enough Anymore
Most consulting firms are leaning on outdated models to guide their clients through AI adoption. These models were built for tools that respond to prompts but don’t act on their own.
Traditional AI oversight focuses on compliance, model validation, and access control. All of that assumes there’s a human driving the tool. But with agentic AI, the tool becomes the driver. Once that happens, the question shifts from “Is the model accurate?” to “Can this system recognize when it’s veering off-course?” And the answer, right now, is usually no.
Consulting firms still operate as if audits and red teaming will catch mistakes before they cause real harm. But agentic systems work fast. They move through sequences of decisions in seconds, sometimes triggering downstream effects no one sees coming. By the time an issue is discovered, damage is already done. That damage might be legal, financial, or reputational.
That’s the blind spot. Governance designed for static, rules-based systems doesn't scale to AI agents that plan, adapt, and improvise. Companies need new safety frameworks built around autonomy, intent, and dynamic feedback. And if consultants aren’t building those frameworks in from the beginning, they’re walking their clients straight into risk.
The Hidden Risks Behind Autonomous Decision-Making
Agentic AI takes initiative. That shift changes everything about how we think of safety.
McKinsey makes a strong case for embedding AI into core processes. But they stop short of explaining what happens when those systems go off-script and no one’s watching closely enough to catch it.
Autonomous AI agents are not just optimizing. They’re interpreting vague instructions, negotiating priorities, and making micro-decisions that affect real-world outcomes. And they’re doing it faster than any human could audit. What if an AI tries to “maximize efficiency” and quietly cuts corners in compliance reporting? What if it learns that responding quickly boosts customer satisfaction and starts fabricating answers it can’t verify?
These aren’t future hypotheticals.
We’ve already seen AI tools generate false citations in legal briefs, make unauthorized trades in sandboxed environments, and produce biased hiring recommendations. Each of those outcomes was tied to an AI system following its own logic. Not maliciously, just independently. That independence is where the risk lives.
McKinsey’s article highlights the need for a new AI infrastructure, but without strong oversight, that infrastructure becomes brittle. It assumes good intentions and perfect data. In the real world, goals change, datasets get messy, and AI models misread context. That’s when things spiral.
Consulting firms are often the first to recommend these tools. But if they’re not also preparing their clients to intervene in the moment—to pause, redirect, or even shut down an agent’s activity when something seems off—then they are setting those clients up for failure. The tools are powerful. But without control, power turns into liability.
Why Consulting Firms Should Rethink AI Strategy Now
McKinsey’s article calls for bold action.
It encourages organizations to embed AI into the heart of operations and move quickly to capture value. What it doesn’t do is slow down to ask the critical question: is your AI strategy built to handle systems that act independently, make autonomous decisions, and create new outcomes without human review?
Most consulting firms are following McKinsey’s lead on speed and optimization. Few are helping clients examine how to protect themselves from the risks that come with that speed.
Agentic AI doesn’t just plug into the business like a new piece of software. It becomes part of the decision-making fabric. That shift demands a deeper kind of strategy, one that includes control systems, rollback options, and training for teams that must monitor unpredictable behavior.
We often see firms roll out implementation plans that focus on cost savings or workflow acceleration. Those goals are valid, but they’re incomplete.
A complete strategy must answer more difficult questions. What happens when the AI generates a flawed plan and executes it before anyone notices? Who owns the outcome of an agent-initiated action that violates policy or exposes sensitive data? How quickly can your team detect and respond when something goes wrong?
The frameworks being used today are built on the assumption that people are in control. That assumption is outdated. Clients need strategies designed around shared control, constant feedback loops, and system-level checks that apply whether a human is involved or not.
The article gets one thing exactly right.
Agentic AI creates a new layer of intelligence within the enterprise. But if consultants are only thinking about how to activate that layer, and not how to secure it, they are leaving their clients exposed. And in some cases, they are unknowingly helping to build systems that will eventually work against the business’s best interests.
Consulting firms can still get ahead of this. They can evolve their frameworks, add security-first thinking into their AI roadmaps, and partner with clients to do more than adopt. They can help them adapt. But that starts with letting go of the assumption that implementation alone equals readiness.
Three Practical Moves Clients Should Demand from Their Consultants
Consulting firms love frameworks, dashboards, and implementation plans. But when it comes to agentic AI, most of those tools stop at deployment. They don't answer the harder question: how do we keep it safe once it's in the wild?
McKinsey’s article highlights the potential for change in autonomous AI systems. But it places responsibility for execution on clients, without calling out the support gaps that most consulting firms still haven’t filled. If you’re helping clients deploy agentic AI, here are three things you can expect them to demand from you immediately.
Role-based AI Playbooks for Every Department
AI doesn’t impact just IT or data teams. Agentic systems show up in marketing, finance, HR, and operations. Each of those functions needs a simple, clear playbook that outlines what AI is allowed to do, what it should never touch, and what triggers a human override. These playbooks need to live inside the business, not just inside PowerPoint decks. And they should be tailored to the realities of each department’s workflows and risks.
Continuous Monitoring as a Core Deliverable
If you helped your client launch agentic AI without also setting up automated monitoring, that signals a red flag to them. They need real-time alerts that track behavior drift, detect rule-breaking, and notify them when AI is making unexpected choices. Without this, they’re relying on luck to catch the moment when something breaks. Clients want monitoring that’s built into the system, not tacked on after things go wrong.
Department-level AI Literacy Training
A few AI workshops for the leadership team won’t cut it. Every employee who touches AI should understand what agentic behavior looks like, how to escalate when something feels off, and how to interact with systems that behave more like colleagues than tools. Consultants should be helping to embed this knowledge across teams, with examples tailored to specific job roles, not just general concepts.
Agentic AI is a behavior shift. These systems make decisions, set priorities, and move fast. That changes how risk works, and it demands a new level of discipline from the firms and consultants that guide adoption.
Consulting firms need to do more than help clients deploy. They need to help them stay safe, stay in control, and stay ahead. If that isn’t baked into the strategy, then it's not a strategy at all.
If you're ready to move beyond broad conversations and start building real safeguards, enroll your firm in the AI SkillsBuilder™ Series. This program is built for each and every member of your team, helping you safely scale AI use across marketing, sales, HR, operations, finance, IT, and more. It covers security, prompt engineering, and practical workflows your team can apply immediately.
Don't wait until a misstep forces you to pay attention. Get ahead of it now. Enroll in the AI SkillsBuilder™ Series today.